Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit SansSerif's column >>

SANSSERIF

Cover =/= Book
Articles Posted: 3  Links Seeded: 9
Member Since: 10/2008  Last Seen: 5/02/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Is it ethical for doctors to stimulate little girls' clitorises?

Seeded on Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:25 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: psychology today
health, ethics, child-abuse, gender, womens-issues, aesthetics, genital-mutilation, medical-invention
Seeded by SansSerif
Advertise | AdChoices

To shorten these clitorises, Poppas is saving the glans (tip) but cutting out parts of the shaft. Bo Laurent has pointed out that Masters and Johnsons showed that many women masturbate by rubbing the shafts of their clitorises. (Think about it: the clit is the homologue of the penis. How do men masturbate?) Many women seem to find their clitoral glans almost too sensitive. Poppas's patients are loosing the option of touching parts of their shafts, because he's throwing them out (after the cut-away parts have been sent to pathology to see if he accidentally took out a nerve)...

...What does the vibrator consist of? These are not like big phallic dildos. They're more like little buzzers, more like the kind of tiny little travel vibrator you can slip past the TSA without major embarrassment on the security line. ("Whose vibrator is this?") But they're still vibrators, and he's still purposely stimulating these girls' clitorises to prove his surgical technique is good.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • SansSerif's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (52)
SansSerif

One time I asked a surgeon who does these surgeries if he had any idea how women actually reach orgasm. What did he actually know, scientifically, about the functional physiology of the adult clitoris? He looked at me blankly, and then said, "But we're working on children." As if they were never going to grow up.

What the @!$%# is wrong with our culture and their OBSESSION with children's genitals?

COH and all that jazz.

  • 6 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:27 AM EDT
Prophat247

Who would subject their children to this kind of testing? Absolutely ridiculous!

  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:08 AM EDT
Reply
Justme-517872

Hell no it's not ethical. That man is a sick freak. Unless there is a valid medical reason he shouldn't be touching them period. If when these children are women, they want to be surgically altered then that is their decision. I don't know which is worse - the pos parents putting them through it or the surgeons willing to do it.

  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:17 PM EDT
kj031056-1

Remember: these are elective surgeries done because a clitoris gets labeled "too big" by an adult looking at the child's genitals.

Well here's hoping they don't start taking close looks at ears or noses for fear they're too big at birth.....and will they be doing "reverse" surgeries for all the little boys who look too small at birth? By who's criteria are they determining what's to big?

  • 8 votes
Reply#3 - Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:11 PM EDT
CynicL1

No it is NOT ok, and what the hell is wrong with these people???

To paraphrase Pink Floyd: Doctor Leave These Kids Alone!

  • 7 votes
Reply#4 - Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:28 PM EDT
PowerIsKnowledge

Unbelievable. If this isn't sexual abuse I don't know what is.

  • 6 votes
Reply#5 - Fri Jun 18, 2010 7:51 PM EDT
SansSerif

It's sexual abuse in posibly it's most base form. Because remember in the case of intersexed children their gender is being decided FOR them based on what is easy/convinient.

  • 5 votes
#5.1 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:55 AM EDT
Reply
VerbalBarb

There is a valid medical reason. This is regarding intersex children (hermaphrodites) who undergo surgery to "make them girls" -

If you do a little more looking into some of the links in the article, this seems to have to do with children who are born with "intersex" difficulties, whose parents decide they should be raised as girls, so gonadal tissue is removed, and the size of (often small) phalluses are reduced so that it appears there is a clitoris, rather than a phallus.

The "testing" is done to determine if the nerves of the phallus/clitoris has been damaged during the surgery.

Since it is easier to change genitalia to look more like a girls' (easier to take away than add) parents often choose to go that route with their intersex children.

It appears that, more recently, the thoughts are turning to allowing an intersex child to determine what gender should pervail, since medical steps CAN be taken at later ages. They are tryng to get away from parents making the choice for the child in early childhood.

I am a bit troubled that this doctor who appears to be looked at as pretty much a God-send and a saint to parents and their children who have urological and genital "deformities", is being made to look like some sort of pervert in these articles that are floating around out there.

  • 5 votes
Reply#6 - Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:44 PM EDT
SansSerif

It appears that, more recently, the thoughts are turning to allowing an intersex child to determine what gender should pervail, since medical steps CAN be taken at later ages. They are tryng to get away from parents making the choice for the child in early childhood.

this is important. How many of the children really understand what's going on? My (as far as we know right now though this could change)cisgendered sister is 8 and still says that "she is part boy" because she likes to play in the dirt and wear dinosaur shirts (as those are "boy" things to do) There is little understanding of how gender "works". At the ages these procedures are being performed.
The parents might think the dr a godsend. But making a potentially life changing decision for a child without their understanding (and based on what surgery may be easier) and then subjecting the children to embarrising and potentally psycologicaly harmful followup exams. Yeah that's a bit sick.

  • 3 votes
#6.1 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:51 AM EDT
VerbalBarb

The parents might think the dr a godsend. But making a potentially life changing decision for a child without their understanding (and based on what surgery may be easier) and then subjecting the children to embarrising and potentally psycologicaly harmful followup exams. Yeah that's a bit sick.

Sick or just uninformed? No one was setting out to deliberately hurt kids, the parents were just doing what they thought was right for their intersex children.

Like many medical problems in children, it seems to take time for people to come around to what is actually best for the child, rather than just letting the parents decide what is best for the child.

It sounds promising that people are coming to the conclusion that it is probably best to wait until the child is older so that the child can be included in making a decision.

  • 2 votes
#6.2 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:03 PM EDT
Kozakura-1552259

Definitely uninformed; ignorant. Nobody should be altering the genitals of a child, unless the child was in a horrible accident involving his/her genitals. Not Ever. WTF is wrong with people?!

  • 1 vote
#6.3 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:18 PM EDT
VerbalBarb

WTF is wrong with people?!

I think parents want to fix things they see as problems for their kids asap. I also think guilt is involved, because parents think that if a child is born with something wrong, they (the parents) contributed to it.

And, yes, a lot of times they are uninformed and certainly ignorant of possible ramifications. All we need to do is look at the history of many medical challenges to see how long it takes people in general and the medical profession to come around to doing what's right and not just what's right for the "patient" and not just what's expedient.

  • 2 votes
#6.4 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:27 PM EDT
NoobPatrol

unless the child was in a horrible accident involving his/her genitals.

I think that may the issue. If you're born with both, does that count as an accident? I don't care to be honest. I'm not the one taking showers in school any more.

    #6.5 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:04 PM EDT
    VerbalBarb

    All we need to do is look at the history of many medical challenges to see how long it takes people in general and the medical profession to come around to doing what's right and not just what's right for the "patient" and not just what's expedient.

    That sentence got away from me. It should read:

    All we need to do is look at the history of many medical challenges to see how long it takes people (in general) and the medical profession to come around to doing what's right for the "patient" and not just what's expedient.

      #6.6 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:17 PM EDT
      SansSerif

      VirbalBarb,

      i agree with you totally on what you just sad. Both are sadly true, what parents will blame themselves for (and then do to try to "fix" it) and how long it can take medicine to figure out it's own ever changing ethics. hopefully in this information age were we are constantly bombarded with new knowledge these changes can happen sooner and less people can suffer unnecessarily.

        #6.7 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:25 PM EDT
        Kozakura-1552259

        If you're born with both, does that count as an accident? I don't care to be honest. I'm not the one taking showers in school any more.

        No I don't think being born with both is a horrible accident. If it doesn't hurt or somehow interfere with day to day life, leave it alone. As long as they can pee just fine, there's no problem. There's no such thing as "normal" anyhow. Everyone is different and unique. Yes some might be more different than others, but who cares? By focusing on it in a negative light(instead of "it's ok to be different") you make it a problem even though it doesn't really exist. When they get to be of an age where they are secure in their sexuality you can introduce to them the idea of elective surgery as an option, just make sure they understand that not having surgery is also very much a valid option. An accident would be if say somehow a firecracker went off in their lap.

        • 3 votes
        #6.8 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:44 PM EDT
        Reply
        dghdrgtDeleted
        Grandpa Dave

        As the father of a girl and the grandfather of a girl, my first reaction was shock. No, revulsion defines it better. Upon reading VerbalBarb's comment, I realize there may be times when the procedure is appropriate, but that should not be my decision as a parent/grandparent. Each individual should be allowed to choose if they are happy or not about themselves.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#8 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:52 AM EDT
        SansSerif

        Yes that's a huge issue. We can't keep thinking it's okay to perform elective cosmetic surgery on children who don't understand what's going on.

        • 4 votes
        #8.1 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:42 AM EDT
        PowerIsKnowledge

        I realize there may be times when the procedure is appropriate, but that should not be my decision as a parent/grandparent. Each individual should be allowed to choose if they are happy or not about themselves.

        I'm agreement with you. About fifteen or twenty years ago I saw a program about hermaphrodites where the parents chose to make them girls and as adults, all of the adult children on the show said they were male. I can't remember any of the details because it's been so long but I do remember that the parents forcing gender upon these individuals screwed them up psychology.

        • 4 votes
        #8.2 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:47 AM EDT
        SansSerif

        Yes I've seen a show simmilar to the one you mentined. I could never do that to a child. Knowing all We know now about gender and genetics and psycology (and how much we don't know!!) and how much of it isn't about what's on the outside I can't immagine as a parent making that choice for a person i don't even know yet.

        • 5 votes
        #8.3 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:00 AM EDT
        PowerIsKnowledge

        7.3- I agree but parents these days are so focused on appearances that they could care less about the mental state of their children.

        • 5 votes
        #8.4 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:11 AM EDT
        Shannoscubie

        We can't keep thinking it's okay to perform elective cosmetic surgery on children who don't understand what's going on.

        I feel that way about circumcision. Just leave it alone. There's nothing wrong with it.

        • 6 votes
        #8.5 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:12 PM EDT
        SansSerif

        I feel that way about circumcision. Just leave it alone. There's nothing wrong with it.

        I agree with you %100!

        • 3 votes
        #8.6 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:41 PM EDT
        CynicL1

        SIGH too late...;-)

        • 2 votes
        #8.7 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:51 PM EDT
        JGL-1583541

        As in... don't do it? Heh I'm 110% glad my parents did it to me. I'm not sure what kind of girls you meet... but none of the one's I've met like uncircumsized. In fact, they were literally SCARED it wouldn't be in a few cases lol.

        I would think it would be harder to keep sanitary, and personally I think the penis looks gross enough without it... much less with it hahaha.

        Of course I don't want children, so luckily I will never have to make that type of decision, but I still am thankful my parents made the one they did.

        • 1 vote
        #8.8 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:26 PM EDT
        SansSerif

        Okay i totally don't want this see turning into a Cut/Uncut debate. Those can go on forever. so i just want to comment and try to get this over :)

        I'm not sure what kind of girls you meet

        I am really sorry if that's the only experience you've had with women. Uninformed people of any gender can be incredibly cruel. I know i only speak personally but i am a woman and I prefer uncut. However neither scares me as long as they're healthy and I've seen plenty! thank you art school!

        I'm glad you are happy with your parents decision, but I could not in good conscious have elective cosmetic surgery performed on my child. hopefully as less parents do it to their babies we will have more understanding women (and men!) in this world that genitals come in all kinds of wonderful shapes and sizes ;)

          #8.9 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:42 PM EDT
          JGL-1583541

          Well it would be prudent to point out that I mention the times it has come up, which hasn't been often, but when it has, it was always to the negative of uncut. That is all I was saying. It hasn't even ever been an issue for me, which is why I was saying that I'm glad =P. Maybe in the cases when it never came up they would have been perfectly fine either way. In the few cases it has come up, it was always "phew, I'm relieved" or something of that nature.

          So I was just getting at if 25% of people will only be with cut, 25% of people prefer cut, 25% of people prefer uncut, and 25% don't care.... well, cut leaves you with the 100% pool, and uncut leaves you with 75% =P Not good statistics I know hah, but you at least get the spirit of what I'm trying to say.

          And yes... maybe it shouldn't be like that... but unfortunately reality doesn't care what you wish things were like =P.

          If people never did it, the stigma would be gone, but you can say that about almost anything hah ;).

            #8.10 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:56 PM EDT
            Reply
            upswing

            Buy the young girl a gift voucher for the "surgery" that she can cash in when she's 18 -- if she wants to.

            Apart from that: WTF!?

            • 5 votes
            Reply#9 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:34 PM EDT
            SansSerif

            This would be better! But I can't immmagin what that would do to the self esteem of a young woman who was comfortable with her body.

            • 1 vote
            #9.1 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:45 PM EDT
            VerbalBarb

            Buy the young girl a gift voucher for the "surgery" that she can cash in when she's 18 -- if she wants to.

            This isn't about "young women" who appear to have clitorises that are "too large". The article is extremely misleading - you have to look at the links given in it to figure out what's going on.

            This is about intersex children (hermaphrodites) who have both male and female genitalia - the reduction of the "clitoris" is used to reduce the size of a male phallus so that it will more resemble a clitoris in an intersex child that wants to look more like a "natural" female.

            • 2 votes
            #9.2 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:10 PM EDT
            upswing

            VerbalBarb:

            This is about intersex children (hermaphrodites) who have both male and female genitalia - the reduction of the "clitoris" is used to reduce the size of a male phallus so that it will more resemble a clitoris in an intersex child that wants to look more like a "natural" female.

            Thanks for the clarification. :-)

            I apparently I didn't read the article closely enough before commenting ...

            • 1 vote
            #9.3 - Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:56 PM EDT
            VerbalBarb

            I apparently I didn't read the article closely enough before commenting ...

            The leading way in which the article/title is written certainly gave me a "WTF?" moment. It just seemed too bizarre that any doctor would be going around cutting up little girls' clitorises on a whim, so I thought I'd check it out a bit further.

            • 1 vote
            #9.4 - Sun Jun 20, 2010 5:08 PM EDT
            SansSerif

            Does it matter? Does it magicly make it okay for the children to be put through this because their gender is not "normal" and after the surgery they are then for all intents (whether correct or not) considered little girls. This is still an unnessesary life altering medical decision being made without the childs informed consent. I don't see how anyone could defend or write this off as "oh it's for intersexed kids" like that makes it allright.

            • 1 vote
            #9.5 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:46 AM EDT
            VerbalBarb

            I don't see how anyone could defend or write this off as "oh it's for intersexed kids" like that makes it allright.

            You're so anxious to be outraged by something, anything, that you're totally overlooking that I presented the WHY of what was being done, because this article makes it sound like some pervert doctor is running around abusing little girls for the fun of it, and parents are allowing it, which is far from the truth. Since the truth lies with people tryng to help intersex chldren (misguided or not), it is evident that this is all about medical procedures (misguided or not).

            I'm merely putting forth information that I found. I pointed out that things are changing and it is being realized that children need to make these decisions for themselves, but you ignore that in order to continue bitching.

              #9.6 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:04 PM EDT
              SansSerif

              the "why" dosen't make it acceptable.

              i understand what you are trying to say and i appreciate it but you've been coming across as an apologist for this behavior more than anything.

              If' I've misread what you've said than i apologize. however i stand by my feelings on this topic.

              • 1 vote
              #9.7 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:00 PM EDT
              VerbalBarb

              If' I've misread what you've said than i apologize. however i stand by my feelings on this topic.

              I was just trying to put what was going on in context, not to be an apologist for it. Sometimes things don't always come across as clearly as we'd like. =0/

                #9.8 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:19 PM EDT
                SansSerif

                and i want trying to be bitchy for the sake of being so. i was just frustrated that the ethics appeared to hang on the child's gender (which we seem to agree they dont!)

                stupid text based internet!

                • 1 vote
                #9.9 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:27 PM EDT
                Reply
                ledgeroo

                I don't know, maybe I'm missing something but this sounds pretty sick and pervy to me. Using vibrators on little girls clits to prove his surgery was "successful" We seem to have a history of denying that children are sexual beings in this country. I am opposed to circumcision as well. Let the child have all the facts, teach them good hygiene and then when they are 16 or 18 they can decide if they want to go ahead with circumcision.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#10 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:39 PM EDT
                NoobPatrol

                That would be good if they were normal little girls. Should that apply to the intersex kids that the article discusses?

                • 2 votes
                #10.1 - Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:50 PM EDT
                SansSerif

                Yes because noone yet knows what gender (if any) he child identifys with and they should not be treated as "Les than" because we think their genitals are weird as long as they are funnctioning at the level a child needs them to.

                • 2 votes
                #10.2 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:51 AM EDT
                Reply
                tdk022755

                I am not a doctor but I am a nurse and in none of my nursing training have I ever heard of anything like this. It does not make sense to me at all and I would be VERY suspicious of ANY physician who had any interest in the genitals of a female child unless there was some sort of infection or abnormality present. And under most circumstances, that would be shown to and discussed with a parent. Most physicians I know never even examine children without a parent being present unless there is suspicion of abuse and when this occurs, there is always some other staff present during the exam process.

                It is my understanding that when children are born with ambiiguous genitalia (meaning they have the sex organs of both male and female) that the current standard it to leave the situation alone until it is determined which way the child is growing toward in terms of gender.

                If I were a parent and if I went to a physician who wanted to be alone with my child for an exam, I would immediately take my child and go to the nearest exit.

                • 3 votes
                Reply#11 - Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:07 AM EDT
                SansSerif

                Thank you it's lovely to hear a nurse weigh in on this. It is nice to hear the the medical standard is becoming leave it alone untill we know what is right for the child.

                  #11.1 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:54 AM EDT
                  VerbalBarb

                  It is nice to hear the the medical standard is becoming leave it alone untill we know what is right for the child.

                  Which I already said in #6 and you agreed.

                    #11.2 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:07 PM EDT
                    SansSerif

                    i did agree! however i was thanking the direct weigh in from the medical industry.

                      #11.3 - Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:02 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      JGL-1583541

                      Meh, I think we should just focus on genetic manipulation so these type of things can be fixed before they come out of the womb. Then the mother and father can choose boy or girl, and no one will be the wiser. None of us get to choose what gender we are... so what does it matter if the parents make the decision or fate does? One way or another you only get to be one gender... and if you aren't happy with it, then tough nugs heh. Be happy you are alive at all and stop worrying about if you "could have been a boy" or a girl. People do that all the time now without the decision being made for them. They are called transvestites.

                      So one way or another people will find a way to be unhappy. At least if you do something about it they can make choices for their life from a foundation of normalcy. Being dual gendered is just not a good situation for anyone to be in.

                      You should remember that this is someone elses life you are talking about. Not yours. If you want to put them through all kinds of adult decisions because off YOUR guilt, is that really saving them? "Oh , I wanted to leave you with a penis AND a vagina just cause I couldn't decide which to get rid of. You should be happy with yourself and who you are!" Great.... so after 40 years and intense therapy the person finally comes to grips with the fact they aren't a "freak" like every person they've ever tried to have a relationship has told them so far. Then they may finally find the 1 person in the world that is actually open minded and tolerant and that happens to be in love with them.

                      All because of some persons outrage... like so many things =P.

                      If I had to go through high school as a half man, half woman just cause my parents didn't have the guts to make a parental decision on my behalf like they are supposd to... that'd piss me off I would think.

                      But as far as the surgery goes... if it is perfect then yay... if it only provides some symblance of normality and everyone who looks can tell something strange and abnormal is going on down there... then it won't even help the situation more than likely, and then we need to turn to more advanced medical procedures like genetic manipulation.

                      People are cruel. Regardless of whether they should be or not. If you force someone to grow up with an abnormality just for the sake of your own conscience and guilt.. I'm not sure if you are doing them a favor, or just being selfish.

                        Reply#12 - Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:06 AM EDT
                        SansSerif

                        i think you mean transgendered.

                        pleas read the wiki article I'm linking to. it may help you get a better understanding of some gender issues. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender

                        There is always going to be shame, fear, and guilt where issues like this come up. but again i say its not it's not anyones place to make that choice for someone else. I know too many people who have walked in these shoes where i have not to take one more choice away from them.

                        • 2 votes
                        #12.1 - Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:21 AM EDT
                        Reply
                        JGL-1583541

                        Heh, well regardless the point is still the same if the word was incorrect. We don't always get to choose. Sometmies we have to make the best of what we have. If people would focus more on being happy with what they have instead of wishing they were someone else then our entire world would be a little less stressful =P.

                        I kind of have a different view on the whole bit, so you aren't going to like talking to me at all =P.

                        I looked at that wiki page... I'm not sure what you want me to see there. I'm not ignorant of the issues, I just don't get caught up in any of the PC terms and such as I feel they are just emotional baggage used to artificially bolster an argument. I want them to do what they wish, and that is just as well for me. Men can dress up like women and have sex with other men if that is what makes them happy. They can marry each other, adopt foster children, or whatever else they care to do, and it makes absolutely no difference to me because it has nothing to do with my life or my ability to be happy.

                        Beyond that, I've never been accused of being a sympathetic person. I don't feel sorry for people for the choices they make in life. I don't believe that people do not have choices either. They may feel compelled to do something, but that doesn't mean they had to do it. They choose to because it is what they want, just like anyone else does. They choose to be with the same gender because it makes them happy, and they choose to accept the consequences of a society that doesn't acknowledge their right to do so. It is just the reality of it. We all have to live with our decisions. That isn't to say people SHOULD descriminate, just that they do and it is no secret and should be no surprise.

                        The point is, we all can decide once we are adults. It is our free will that makes that possible. Our nature is one thing, and our sentience another. We choose to be slaves to the body... or free from it. I choose the latter. Male... female... shemale... makes no difference to me I will judge you based on who you are not what your body is. If everything you are is based on your body... well... I guess you'd better hope I like your body then ;).

                        Take one more choice away from them.... very valiant statement truely, but one that in my mind holds only emotional undertones and not much reality. Some things just are. If you are born a man, and you WISH you were a female... well, I hate it for you. If your parents made decisions you don't agree with... again, hate it for you. In the end though, we make decisions based on the cards we were dealt. We either push forward, and make a success from our lives and find happiness... or we whine, give up, and complain about how we "wish" the world would be.

                        Parents are people too. What about THEIR choice? Why do you get to tell them what they should choose for their child any more than they do? Why is your opinion worth more than theirs? Is it because you feel you are ethically superior? probably.. and I would venture to say obviously =P. Would the child agree? Not sure... you seem to think you know what they want, even though you complain of their parents making the same assumptions.

                        In the end... this entire thread is focused on making decisions about someone elses life.. their children... for them. Exactly the same type of thing you accuse people of doing for the LGBT community. Telling them what they should do with their bodies and the bodies of their loved ones and children. Is it really your place to decide what these parents do with their kids? Are you saving the kids... or just projecting your own hopelessness unto them... thinking you are championing their cause because of personal experience?

                        It seems to me that controlling another person's life and children is just as bad as them trying to control your sexuality. While you may not agree with their choices... just as they don't agree with yours... don't you think you have to let them make their own mistakes and lives? Don't you think they deserve to be able to choose for themselves? Or is your opinion what matters, and they should live their lives as you wish becuse you feel righteous?

                        They feel righteous too... it would be wise to think about that before you try and tell them what to do with their bodies and the children that they have made with them. They have their own happiness to find, and their own path with its own trials to get there.

                          Reply#13 - Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:05 AM EDT
                          SansSerif

                          We either push forward, and make a success from our lives and find happiness...

                          I wish more people could do this. The world would be a much better place.

                          I probably won't like talking to you! we could agree on some things but i think our approach is very different.

                          If everything you are is based on your body... well... I guess you'd better hope I like your body then

                          I don't understand this but i'm perfectly happy with who i am, i love being a woman, I know i'll never be model thin and i'm okay with that though i could stand to lose some weight for my health, and i think i'm pretty but not in a conceitedway. so i've never really experienced being unhappy with my body. Its a magical privileged place where i get to hang out. but many people don't have that luxury. I really don't understand people who are so unhappy with themselves that they want to change what gender they are but i have friends who are and i know that it is some amazing pain that they are going through. and all i do know is that its not my right to decide for them. and its not a choice i would make for my children.

                          You have a very sound argument in the defence of FGM. i'm really not accusing you of supporting that but where do we draw the line of children being chattel? Parents have a right to happiness of course but at some point they have to realize they are creating unique human beings, not toys.

                          I love that parents want to help their kids but there have got to be better ways to do it.

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#14 - Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:48 AM EDT
                          JGL-1583541

                          What I meant by that sentence is that a lot of people seem to draw their entire indentity up into their physical form. Either they identify themselves with the "classic" beauty, which is to say they just think they are a "hot chick" or a "stud" and that is about all they are inside and out =P, or they mold and shape their body to show it to the world and declare "LOOK! This is ME!". In those cases they invest all of who they are into what they want people to see. Sometimes this becomes inseparable from who they actually are as a sentient. One example would be to say that you are "A man trapped in a woman's body". So you dress your body up like a man, try hard as you can to look like a man, and then you model your personality after what you show people.

                          To me... you aren't a man trapped in a woman's body any more than someone is a woman trapped in a woman's body. I guess more accurately you could say we are ALL trapped in our bodies in the same fashion =P. The difference is... you are just a consciousness. You aren't a man... or a woman in your mind. That is strictly what your body is one way or another. The way people treat you, how you are raised, the things you've done and seen... that is what makes you a "man" or a "woman" in your own mind. The fact that your experiences have led you to believe you have the mindset of a woman and the body of a man... is... well it is individual experience, but your consciousness isn't "tagged" to be one or another. It just IS. The rest is a reality you have created for yourself and that other people have impressed upon you. Some cases it is a hormonal imbalance that facilitates those thoughts as well... but that is more of a medical problem than an identity crisis, even if it is treated as such and ends up being such.

                          One day we may be able to walk into an office somewhere and say "You know Doc... I'd like to be a female this week." and ZAP, an hour later you walk out biologically female in every way.Imagine the impact THAT will have on our view of the male and female gender roles lol. I think imagining it might help you understand exactly how I view the entire thing. If that happened, and you never know who is born male or female, and you can't tell any difference... then what? I don' t know... but that would be a damn interesting experiment hahaha.

                          Until then I look at it in the most basic way possible... easy for me to do I suppose as I have no confusion, or even an inkling of confusion over who I am, because it has nothing to do with my body. I feel, although it is hard to say for sure since I of course don't have the ability to test the hypothesis, that if I were female, that I wouldn't care to be with a man. It doesn't please me to think about at the moment, but I imagine if I was a woman, and men found me attractive... that it wouldn't be an altogether terrible ordeal. I could think of worse things in this world than being a woman and trying to find attractive qualities in men after all, 50% of the population seems to do just fine with it (roughly speaking hehehe).

                          Now as far as FGM... if you are saying female genital mutilation.. I would vehemently say hell no I don't support that as long as we are talking about the same definition. There is absolutely no way I think any female should have her sexual organs removed or damaged so they cannot feel sex , etc. That is just... barbaric and serves no purpose. I also don't think parents should be able to torture and kill their children, or other such things, but I don't think an operation to settle on a gender when they are born hermaphrodites is really the same concept. We are talking about a genetic mutation in these cases, where there is an obvious deformity and the parent has to make a decision on removing the deformity (if the option is VIABLE and available) or leaving it and letting them deal with it on their own when they become an adult. In my mind that is a matter of opinion. I would think that there are many cases where that can go either way. Either the child comes to grips with their reality and grows up with a healthy mental image of themselves and the world... or they grow up to hate life and how hard it is on them, and never become healthy. Then you have all the in-betweens where they EVENTUALLY come to grips =P.

                          To me... settling on a gender could very well be a mercy. Especially if the child never knows differently. Why not have them grow up as a non-deformed human if they have the chance? The only argument I could think of is if you think that someone is actually a "female" or "male" in their head, and you are guessing 50/50, and if you get it wrong.. oops, now you have a very confused person on your hands. I guess I don't believe that as I've said, which is why I say just do the poor kid a favor and let them have a normal life. I appreciate all the hardships people go through to be who they are, but does that mean we WANT people to endure those hardships just out of spite to those who would be cruel about it?

                          In the future we WILL have a better way hopefully! When a doctor looks at the DNA and says, we have these abnomalities present, would you like to remedy them so they don't have a third eye, an extra penis, and a 6th toe? and you say "sure." and they come out healthy and happy and live lives completely independent of that decision. I think that is responsible. There is no reason to have deformity if you can prevent it. I think it is the fact that people who are alive who view the "fixing" of the "problem" in the future as saying that they are a "problem" that needs to be "fixed", is where you run into the stigma. I think that is largly just selfishness on the part of those people that makes them say that though.

                          The old saying "Misery loves company", is ultimately true on many different levels in our society. Even if people don't realize that is what they are doing.

                            #14.1 - Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:24 AM EDT
                            Reply
                            SansSerif

                            The difference is... you are just a consciousness

                            we totally agree here. and this is a frustration i'm going through with a Trans friend of mine. she can put on a skirt but can't seem to put on the personality. though there are many many issues there.

                            "You know Doc... I'd like to be a female this week."

                            this was a fantastic "new" outer limits episode.

                            I feel, although it is hard to say for sure since I of course don't have the ability to test the hypothesis, that if I were female, that I wouldn't care to be with a man.

                            Sexual preference is a whole 'nother can of worms! and none of it is straight (hahah) forward. but i'd say sexual preference is (usually) completely separate from sexual identity. If you woke up as a woman (physically) yous most likely still be attracted to women. as you said it's about consciousness :)

                            To me... settling on a gender could very well be a mercy. Especially if the child never knows differently. Why not have them grow up as a non-deformed human if they have the chance?

                            I could agree with this if it is not done out of convenience (making them all default to girls because shorteningthe clitoris is easier than making it a penis) but done with actual compassion and scientific backing. there are more than visual ways to determine the genetic leaning of an intersexed child (if there is a genetic leaning) so if the surgery's were done to make them outwardly what they were genetically then i could be supportive. but lets not give vagina's to genetic boys with male levels of testosterone and internal testes instead of ovary's.

                            i hope you get what i'm saying there.

                            In the future we WILL have a better way hopefully! When a doctor looks at the DNA and says, we have these abnomalities present, would you like to remedy them so they don't have a third eye, an extra penis, and a 6th toe?

                            that would be ideal. but helloooo GATTACA! lol. hopefully though things like base male/female gender won't become an anomaly like in china.

                              Reply#15 - Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:57 AM EDT
                              JGL-1583541

                              I could agree with this if it is not done out of convenience (making them all default to girls because shorteningthe clitoris is easier than making it a penis) but done with actual compassion and scientific backing. there are more than visual ways to determine the genetic leaning of an intersexed child (if there is a genetic leaning) so if the surgery's were done to make them outwardly what they were genetically then i could be supportive. but lets not give vagina's to genetic boys with male levels of testosterone and internal testes instead of ovary's.

                              Maybe we agree more than I originally thought we would then hah. I definately see what you are saying there, and I would have to say I do agree. Taking the "easiest option" isn't at all what I would call responsible =P. Like you pointed out, if they are chemically predisposed for being male.. that is an influence someone would really need to take into account. I can see how a parent might look at the choice of "make the baby 100% female, or leave it as is" and choose female even if it isn't the best option. In that case I would say considering that is tantamount to giving a little boy a boob job and telling him he's a girl cause look, he has breasts. It is a hard decision to make though... I wouldn't envy anyone who has to make it. In the end IF making them male isn't an option... I dunno I would still have to leave it up to the parent. I don't think you will make it out of that situation unscathed regardless, and either would the child, so you are damned if you do, damned if you don't. I can see how you might default to saying the child should have the option at some point... but it is hard to say which life would be the tougher one... growing to adulthood without any gender identity and then trying to choose one, or trying to grow up coping with having a biology that is alien to your gender identity. Neither one sounds anywhere close to ideal... and so I point back to "making the best of the lives we are given" heh.

                              I suppose that would take me back to the point I made about the options being VIABLE as well as available =P. In a perfect setting, you would be able to just make the decision based on the physical attributes the child possesses, and if they are "more" boy then you go with boy, if they are "more" girl then you go with girl. If they are Evenly distributed.. you really just have to choose whatever... because I think doesn't matter which they will always be a little confused if their body acts gender neutral.

                              I'm going to go with genetic manipulation, and we are not as far off as you might think =P... if we can survive the next few years that is heh.

                                #15.1 - Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:27 PM EDT
                                SansSerif

                                Neither one sounds anywhere close to ideal... and so I point back to "making the best of the lives we are given" heh.

                                There is no ideal when you're dealt a hand like that. its why there are still elective abortions for the even worse things that can go wrong with a pregnancy. you do what you hope is best and work things out from there. but nothing should be done simply for convenience because if that's the criteria then nothing ends up being easy.

                                I'm going to go with genetic manipulation, and we are not as far off as you might think =P

                                I want a 12 fingered cat girl with two penises...she'll be the life of the party. ;)

                                  #15.2 - Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:55 PM EDT
                                  Reply
                                  Leave a Comment:
                                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                  You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                  (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                  Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                  FUN STUFF:
                                  • Leaderboard |
                                  • E-Mail Alerts |
                                  • Top of the Vine |
                                  • Newsvine Live |
                                  • Newsvine Archives |
                                  • The Greenhouse |
                                  COMPANY STUFF:
                                  • Code of Honor |
                                  • Company Info |
                                  • Contact Us |
                                  • Jobs |
                                  • User Agreement |
                                  • Privacy Policy |
                                  • About our ads
                                  LEGAL STUFF:
                                  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com